Lichess Feedback - How to report a bug?#11 Well clearly not a bug. | Deadban |
General Chess Discussion - Is 'CALL DRAW' button really used by Lichess users?#12 https://lichess.org/jRyVWy1c/white | Deadban |
Lichess Feedback - Chess basics - Ruk get the stars number 4 cannot get a 3 stars#5 Tricky but doable. | Deadban |
General Chess Discussion - Quadrupled Pawns#3 > I think this is my first game on lichess where I got quadrupled pawns Start playing crazyhouse more. | Deadban |
General Chess Discussion - Lichess and Chess com's anti-cheat efforts remain a total and complete joke.#19 If neither Lichess and chesscom ban the players you report there might be an alternative reason why. | Deadban |
General Chess Discussion - How often should 2000-rated players win with above 90% accuracy?#36 You have no idea of how cheat detection works and I will stop right here, thank you. | Deadban |
General Chess Discussion - How often should 2000-rated players win with above 90% accuracy?#32 @Rogue_Berserker said in #25: > You have misunderstood this. To effectively identify the vast majority of cheating, Chess.com computes an aggregate Strength Score. Strength Score is a measurement of t… | Deadban |
General Chess Discussion - How often should 2000-rated players win with above 90% accuracy?#24 I count four errors in #23: > Find a banned player, and you will find high accuracy. The error is "high". The correct word is "an". > Find a game with 98% accuracy, and you will probably find that the… | Deadban |
General Chess Discussion - Using engine when you have ongoing unrated games with no time limit#3 You can analyze games that have totally different positions than the ongoing game, however it's a risk. | Deadban |
General Chess Discussion - How often should 2000-rated players win with above 90% accuracy?#2 Repeat with me: The accuracy % is not a reliable parameter to determine cheating. The accuracy % is not a reliable parameter to determine cheating. The accuracy % is not a reliable parameter to determ… | Deadban |
Next |
---|