@infinite2009 nothing is impossible is a false statement. Then a computer can also it.
just said for entertainment purpose, don't think deeply :)
@Linspiring #17: Opponent 471 !?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?
ACPL stands for average centipawn loss.
and how do non-experts get 0 ACPL, as I see in the forum?
I expected 2000+ OTB players ( about 2300 lichess rapid) to post here lol.
Like I have 2472 rapid (2100 national (OTB) and 15 years old) and I never had a 0, my best was 2 and I barely get below 5, I find it good to even get below 15 (I'm not talking about my games on lichess, I'm talking about OTB). In my last OTB tournament my best game was 4 ACPL and my worst was 46 ACPL, so a zero score is literally impossible for me.
I expected 2000+ OTB players ( about 2300 lichess rapid) to post here lol.
Like I have 2472 rapid (2100 national (OTB) and 15 years old) and I never had a 0, my best was 2 and I barely get below 5, I find it good to even get below 15 (I'm not talking about my games on lichess, I'm talking about OTB). In my last OTB tournament my best game was 4 ACPL and my worst was 46 ACPL, so a zero score is literally impossible for me.
@mrbumba1287
pffft 1 inaccuracy. You should learn to play good like me 0 0 0 0 :))))))@AnantKalia2006 said in #23:
> @Linspiring #17: Opponent 471 !?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?
The OP called for a 0 cpl game, not a double one :P
pffft 1 inaccuracy. You should learn to play good like me 0 0 0 0 :))))))@AnantKalia2006 said in #23:
> @Linspiring #17: Opponent 471 !?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?
The OP called for a 0 cpl game, not a double one :P
1 out of 1,000,000 games you can do it :)
in this game I have 0 centipowns lost. If you play perfectly an opening and your opponent does not play well it's possibile
#3 It is actually possible to get 100% accuracy on chess.com
Here's the first time I've discovered such a game: www.chess.com/forum/view/general/100-game-accuracy
But the forums have better examples which could actually be considered games
Here's the first time I've discovered such a game: www.chess.com/forum/view/general/100-game-accuracy
But the forums have better examples which could actually be considered games
Different runs of the analysis will lead to different results. So your +2 can be +4 or +6 later.
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.