Absolutely not.
Correct movesets are over the vast majority of the time in less than 20 moves.
However, upon both players playing weird nonsense moves (most commonly seen in the 0+1 games) games can easily surpass 40 moves without getting to 'draw moves'
In fact, I'd argue that there are just as many 40+ move games between high rating player than there are <30 move games. Its not often a 'good player' does normal answers to common white opening movesets (ie e3 c4 etc), and against another 2k+ rating this often in return provokes a non-sequitur response.
This leads to very interesting games; that were blunder filled nightmares but never enter 'draw territory'
Antichess already has repetition draw; where if both players make a 'non move' X# of times in a row; it is a draw.
Thats good enough.
Long story short; no because a 30 move rule would get rid of the truly comical games.
Hows this for an example roflmao. Me and QoB.
63 moves. You saying this should of drawn at 30...LOL...look at where it was at 30. Due to ridiculous beginning movesets it was anybodys game at the 30 move mark.
And again below that is me and Townes at 59 moves.
If aint broke dont fix it :)
@crptone @finlip @isaacly @Karagialis @MangoTownTravis @Radioactive7 @Toadofsky @V2chess _____________________________________
@risky-chess I think you didnt think this through :o
532 games of yours are more than 30 moves. Thats over 1/4 of your total games played.
So 25% of your games should of been a draw? Ya no :o
lichess.org/@/risky-chess/search?turnsMin=30&perf=13&players.a=risky-chess&sort.field=d&sort.order=desc