lichess.org
Donate
 
Computer analysisMove timesCrosstableShare & export
FEN
[Event "Rated Crazyhouse game"] [Site "https://lichess.org/q856ckBC"] [Date "2024.02.03"] [White "baggiosj"] [Black "zbxah"] [Result "1-0"] [UTCDate "2024.02.03"] [UTCTime "19:46:03"] [WhiteElo "1500"] [BlackElo "1536"] [WhiteRatingDiff "+261"] [BlackRatingDiff "-3"] [Variant "Crazyhouse"] [TimeControl "180+0"] [ECO "E53"] [Opening "Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Gligoric System"] [Termination "Normal"] [Annotator "lichess.org"] 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4?? { (0.93 → -0.97) Blunder. Bf4 was best. } (2. Bf4 g6 3. Nc3 d5 4. e3 Bg7 5. Nge2 h6 6. Ng3 Be6) 2... e6? { (-0.97 → 0.38) Mistake. d5 was best. } (2... d5 3. Nc3 dxc4 4. e4 P@d3 5. Qa4+ Nc6 6. Qxc4 Qxd4 7. Qxd4) 3. Nc3?! { (0.38 → -0.70) Inaccuracy. e3 was best. } (3. e3 d5 4. Nf3 Nc6 5. Be2 Bd6 6. c5 Be7 7. O-O O-O 8. Nc3 Ne4 9. Bd3 f5) 3... Bb4 4. e3 O-O 5. Bd3 c5 6. Nf3?! { (0.46 → -0.53) Inaccuracy. Nh3 was best. } (6. Nh3 Nc6 7. O-O d5 8. Ng5 dxc4 9. Bxc4 Bxc3 10. bxc3 N@d6 11. Be2 Nde4 12. Nxe4 Nxe4) 6... d5?! { (-0.53 → 0.45) Inaccuracy. cxd4 was best. } { E53 Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Gligoric System } (6... cxd4) 7. cxd5?? { (0.45 → -2.28) Blunder. O-O was best. } (7. O-O Nc6 8. Ng5 dxc4 9. Bxc4 Bxc3 10. bxc3 P@h6 11. P@e5 hxg5 12. exf6 Qxf6 13. N@g4 Qd8) 7... exd5 8. dxc5?? { (-2.42 → -5.24) Blunder. Bd2 was best. } (8. Bd2 P@e4) 8... Bxc5?? { (-5.24 → 4.38) Blunder. P@e4 was best. } (8... P@e4) 9. O-O?? { (4.38 → -4.46) Blunder. P@e5 was best. } (9. P@e5 Ng4 10. P@c7 Qxc7 11. Nxd5 P@e4 12. Bxe4 P@f5 13. Bc2 P@e2 14. Qxe2 Qc6 15. P@c4 Be6) 9... Nc6?? { (-4.46 → 1.50) Blunder. P@e4 was best. } (9... P@e4 10. P@h6 P@h3 11. gxh3 gxh6 12. P@e5 exf3 13. P@g7 N@g5 14. gxf8=Q+ Kxf8 15. R@g3 P@e4 16. exf6) 10. P@d4?? { (1.50 → -6.09) Blunder. P@c7 was best. } (10. P@c7 Qd6) 10... Be7?? { (-6.09 → -0.70) Blunder. P@e4 was best. } (10... P@e4) 11. Qc2?? { (-0.70 → -10.25) Blunder. P@h6 was best. } (11. P@h6 gxh6) 11... P@e4 12. Be2 exf3 13. Bxf3 Bg4?! { (-10.83 → -6.80) Inaccuracy. P@h3 was best. } (13... P@h3) 14. Bxg4 Nxg4 15. Qf5?! { (-6.85 → -15.06) Inaccuracy. B@h3 was best. } (15. B@h3 Nb4 16. Qd1 Nxh2 17. Kxh2 P@c2 18. Qg4 N@h6 19. Qh5 B@g6 20. Qf3 P@g4 21. Bxg4 Nxg4+) 15... Nh6 16. Qf3 B@e6 17. B@d3 N@f6?! { (-14.38 → -6.39) Inaccuracy. P@e4 was best. } (17... P@e4 18. Nxe4 dxe4 19. Bxe4 N@g5 20. P@e2 Ng4 21. P@g3 Nxf3+ 22. Bxf3 Nxh2 23. Kxh2 P@e4 24. Bh5) 18. P@f5?! { (-6.39 → -12.46) Inaccuracy. Qd1 was best. } (18. Qd1 Nb4) 18... P@e4 19. Qg3 Nxf5 20. Qe5 Nxe5 21. dxe5 exd3 22. exf6 Bxf6 23. e4 dxe4 24. Nxe4 B@d5 25. Nxf6+ Qxf6 26. N@h5 Qe7?! { (Mate in 3 → -40.96) Lost forced checkmate sequence. N@h3+ was best. } (26... N@h3+ 27. Kh1 Q@g1+ 28. Rxg1 Nxf2#) 27. P@g4?! { (-40.96 → Mate in 3) Checkmate is now unavoidable. B@h3 was best. } (27. B@h3 P@e2) 27... N@e2+ 28. Kh1 Nxc1?! { (Mate in 3 → -32.37) Lost forced checkmate sequence. Bxg2+ was best. } (28... Bxg2+ 29. Kxg2 Nh4+ 30. Kh1 P@g2#) 29. Raxc1?! { (-32.37 → Mate in 3) Checkmate is now unavoidable. B@h3 was best. } (29. B@h3 P@f3) 29... d2?! { (Mate in 3 → -32.00) Lost forced checkmate sequence. Bxg2+ was best. } (29... Bxg2+ 30. Kxg2 Nh4+ 31. Kh1 Q@g2#) 30. Rcd1?! { (-32.00 → Mate in 3) Checkmate is now unavoidable. P@e4 was best. } (30. P@e4 Bxe4) 30... P@e2?! { (Mate in 3 → -43.87) Lost forced checkmate sequence. Bxg2+ was best. } (30... Bxg2+ 31. Kxg2 Nh4+ 32. Kg3 Q@f3#) 31. N@f6+ gxf6 32. gxf5?! { (-49.92 → Mate in 4) Checkmate is now unavoidable. Nf4 was best. } (32. Nf4 exf1=Q+) 32... exf1=Q+ 33. Rxf1 Bxf5?? { (Mate in 4 → Mate in 2) Lost forced checkmate sequence. Bxg2+ was best. } (33... Bxg2+ 34. Kxg2 Q@g4+ 35. B@g3 B@f3+ 36. Kg1 N@e2#) 34. N@h6+ Kh8 35. B@g7# { White wins by checkmate. } 1-0