| Community Blog Discussions - Science of Chess: A g-factor for chess? A psychometric scale for playing ability#33 @NDpatzer said in #18: > That would be pretty cool. If you haven't already, do check out what else the authors have to say about their exploratory analysis. Not the same as what you're describing, but… | tackyshrimp |
| Community Blog Discussions - Science of Chess: A g-factor for chess? A psychometric scale for playing ability#17 I'm a doctoral psychology student who's done a bit of bifactor modeling with the p-factor. Are you thinking of maybe doing some model comparisons using the ACT data? Compare, say, a one-factor, second… | tackyshrimp |
| Community Blog Discussions - Evaluating Sharpness using LC0's WDL#17 @jk_182 said in #14: > I have thought about this quite a bit, but my main problem is that it's difficult to deal with only moves that are easy to find. A recapture is a perfect example: if you don't r… | tackyshrimp |
| Community Blog Discussions - Evaluating Sharpness using LC0's WDL#13 Very interesting! I think another component of sharpness is the degree to which only-lines or only-moves are needed to maintain the evaluation of a position. For example, one player might have a +4.0 … | tackyshrimp |