1650+- А
1300+- B
1050 +- C
If it is chess.com Elo standings.
Deduced from my 30 1+0 game experience there + shallow analysis of given trends
1300+- B
1050 +- C
If it is chess.com Elo standings.
Deduced from my 30 1+0 game experience there + shallow analysis of given trends
Some charts are too small to read. Is there a possibility to make the charts bigger?
I think the first graph should be labeled B, C, A, top to bottom.
I was sure from this graph that the order was A < B < C just because more games should end in resignation and fewer by checkmate at higher levels.
But then the later charts show that A is the best player, followed by C.
The timing chart was not helpful as I have no intuition about it. I guess in bullet faster = better, but I think the results would be different in other time controls.
Clues 3 and 4 seem pretty definitive B < C < A.
I was sure from this graph that the order was A < B < C just because more games should end in resignation and fewer by checkmate at higher levels.
But then the later charts show that A is the best player, followed by C.
The timing chart was not helpful as I have no intuition about it. I guess in bullet faster = better, but I think the results would be different in other time controls.
Clues 3 and 4 seem pretty definitive B < C < A.
@Saltimbocca said in #3:
> Some charts are too small to read. Is there a possibility to make the charts bigger?
I had to open the charts in a separate tab in my browser, maybe you can try that? (right click and view image in tab)
Or you could download and open in an image program lol.
> Some charts are too small to read. Is there a possibility to make the charts bigger?
I had to open the charts in a separate tab in my browser, maybe you can try that? (right click and view image in tab)
Or you could download and open in an image program lol.
A>C>B
@linux_mno said in #4:
> I think the first graph should be labeled B, C, A, top to bottom.
>
> I was sure from this graph that the order was A < B < C just because more games should end in resignation and fewer by checkmate at higher levels.
>
> But then the later charts show that A is the best player, followed by C.
>
> The timing chart was not helpful as I have no intuition about it. I guess in bullet faster = better, but I think the results would be different in other time controls.
>
> Clues 3 and 4 seem pretty definitive B < C < A.
Well, I don't want to say anything wrong, however from my Lichess bullet experience I am pretty sure that the higher your rating, the less you resign.
Better to flag your opponent (which one of my opponents tried after losing the bishop in the opening and he almost did it) than lose without a battle
> I think the first graph should be labeled B, C, A, top to bottom.
>
> I was sure from this graph that the order was A < B < C just because more games should end in resignation and fewer by checkmate at higher levels.
>
> But then the later charts show that A is the best player, followed by C.
>
> The timing chart was not helpful as I have no intuition about it. I guess in bullet faster = better, but I think the results would be different in other time controls.
>
> Clues 3 and 4 seem pretty definitive B < C < A.
Well, I don't want to say anything wrong, however from my Lichess bullet experience I am pretty sure that the higher your rating, the less you resign.
Better to flag your opponent (which one of my opponents tried after losing the bishop in the opening and he almost did it) than lose without a battle
A is definitely a very good player (let's say 1800+ Lichess elo in bullet).
C employs a similar approach to playing (generally going for best moves), but is substantially weaker - let's say 1200-1400 bullet.
B is really tricky. He's definitely the random bullshitty type of player - going for quick premove traps and such rather than calculating. That makes his play objectively the worst, but the highest percentage of getting checkmated means his opponents are objectively rather good, and bullshitting gets you quite far in 1+0 (even though I'll hate you for it).
Then again, I would favor A in a matchup based on the given parameters, so I'll give B 1650 bullet elo.
Hence A>B>C.
The chart that's off is probably time management, it's not in line with other charts.
C employs a similar approach to playing (generally going for best moves), but is substantially weaker - let's say 1200-1400 bullet.
B is really tricky. He's definitely the random bullshitty type of player - going for quick premove traps and such rather than calculating. That makes his play objectively the worst, but the highest percentage of getting checkmated means his opponents are objectively rather good, and bullshitting gets you quite far in 1+0 (even though I'll hate you for it).
Then again, I would favor A in a matchup based on the given parameters, so I'll give B 1650 bullet elo.
Hence A>B>C.
The chart that's off is probably time management, it's not in line with other charts.
Clues 2,3,4,5 seem to all indicate that A>C>B. So, I think that clue 1 is mislabelled. I'd expect the real labels to be, from top to bottom: B, C, A
<Comment deleted by user>