Congratulations! @mutdpro sir for winning titled arena!
lichess is the best!
chess is not a game to pay!
I mean I understand paying for football but paying for chess is none sense!
I don't play chess for a long time and only can follow events and Magnus's games because I don't have free time but I was using lichess when I was active and still appreciate lichess and people who work here
chess is not a game to pay!
I mean I understand paying for football but paying for chess is none sense!
I don't play chess for a long time and only can follow events and Magnus's games because I don't have free time but I was using lichess when I was active and still appreciate lichess and people who work here
I am waiting for Hikaru's reaction about this blog.
Great article guys!
I think Chess.com contributes less to the Chess world by giving you a more advanced system while paying none.
I left Chess.com about 2 years ago because it became almost impossible to play back then at a 1700 rating due to the unbelievable amount of cheaters, not to mention they didn't take care of complaints about it (I don't know how it is now).
I wasn't keen at first to play at lichess.com (After so many years on chess.com), but I am glad I did.
In order to keep chess popular, we have to make chess more approachable & I don't think chess.com has it in its ideal - it's a company, and the company is there to make profits - that's how it is in life.
I left Chess.com about 2 years ago because it became almost impossible to play back then at a 1700 rating due to the unbelievable amount of cheaters, not to mention they didn't take care of complaints about it (I don't know how it is now).
I wasn't keen at first to play at lichess.com (After so many years on chess.com), but I am glad I did.
In order to keep chess popular, we have to make chess more approachable & I don't think chess.com has it in its ideal - it's a company, and the company is there to make profits - that's how it is in life.
Is the title correct? Why say "grandmaster" if an IM won it?
To me, this article is written in the style of an explicit indirect criticism of Chess.com and a desire to prove oneself cool against the backdrop of an unfortunate looking competitor. Exactly the competitor, that's how it looks in the article. Not a bit of gratitude to anyone, just a smirk. Don't do that, please behave more decently. You are, after all, one of the officials of Lichess. And no need for sarcasm. If I were you, if I wanted to say something constructive, I would have written this article in a completely different way.
Yay he got good master title lol
Minh Le won the race? I can't believe it!
@Robaloooo said in #57:
> Did you know that Hikaru's net worth is $50 million?
>
> Puts a strange twist on this for me.
Yes, I'm his personal banker and have access to all his bank accounts and investment funds. He just doesn't know it yet.
> Did you know that Hikaru's net worth is $50 million?
>
> Puts a strange twist on this for me.
Yes, I'm his personal banker and have access to all his bank accounts and investment funds. He just doesn't know it yet.
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.