Ok u were too fast.
but i'm definitely feeding the troll at this point^^
Pseudonym then how does weaken the pressure square with black wanted more? You 2 contradict each other.
When a 1600 does it you can explain to them that it was bad because it broke a rule.
When an NM does it you have to analyze the position to determine if it was actually bad, and if so, how bad.
I see Ne4+f5 as an aggressive plan, possibly intending to attack after white castles kingside (he could have played 7...Bf5 for what looks like boring equality to me), pseudonymous3 sees it as something else. We're not the same person so we're allowed to contradict each other.
When an NM does it you have to analyze the position to determine if it was actually bad, and if so, how bad.
I see Ne4+f5 as an aggressive plan, possibly intending to attack after white castles kingside (he could have played 7...Bf5 for what looks like boring equality to me), pseudonymous3 sees it as something else. We're not the same person so we're allowed to contradict each other.
High rated players make mistakes too.
about f5 :
Rapidv is probably (psychologically) right in this case as black was looking for a "forward" and aggressive move and plans of f5-f4 and such
Generally speaking however, i see the lasker variation (Ne4) in queens gambit as a way to propose exchanges and a faster transition into an endgame
Rapidv is probably (psychologically) right in this case as black was looking for a "forward" and aggressive move and plans of f5-f4 and such
Generally speaking however, i see the lasker variation (Ne4) in queens gambit as a way to propose exchanges and a faster transition into an endgame
but as Rapidvariants said, if we can find 2 separate reasonable justifications for these moves, it means its not that bad after all :)
Wow! So many answers, thanks for all contributors.
@pseudonymous3
Yes i often just rely on the computer analysis, because i am not a high
rated player.
@thoughtless2
Yes you are right, the time was just 3:00, i did not considered this.
@RapidVariants
WOW! Now that's what i call game analysis, it is unfortune stockfish cant give these
explanations. If lichess would allow i would give you honor, or silver medal (reddit).
Very well detailed, thank you! I always learn something.
@pseudonymous3
Yes i often just rely on the computer analysis, because i am not a high
rated player.
@thoughtless2
Yes you are right, the time was just 3:00, i did not considered this.
@RapidVariants
WOW! Now that's what i call game analysis, it is unfortune stockfish cant give these
explanations. If lichess would allow i would give you honor, or silver medal (reddit).
Very well detailed, thank you! I always learn something.
Ok then on another point,how aggressive is an attackin plan that weakens the own king?
And i dont think time matters when it comes to positional ideas.
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.