carlsen vs niemann, checkmate"

Given the damage to chess with the world press's incoherent insinuation or accusation against the young American, mistaking neophytes, intentionally or not, for "prizeless" friendly online blitz games (-10m) for official live competition games at a classic rhythm "with prizes" (3 or 4 hours), and its different anti-cheating methods (it is almost impossible to do them in person), I want to provide irrefutable proof with the analysis of the game that gave rise to the current media problem.
Enjoy it, maybe they will change their personal and editorial opinion:
lichess.org/study/fo3rio6M/15qwfDAJ

Cheaters allways remains the same. Its about the mindset. It seems to me that chess is Just a sport of losers, who only play it cause its easy to cheat. Niemann showed how easy it is to cheat and still be at the top. What else do players have to do to be punished??? Ur IM title or what ever titles are Out there, easy by cheating, no one would notice. Cause chess players still believe in Santa clause...
U guys should be worried about the next years, cause cheating will increase tremendously.
Have fun

@Paramos said in #1:
> Given the damage to chess with the world press's incoherent insinuation or accusation against the young American, mistaking neophytes, intentionally or not, for "prizeless" friendly online blitz games (-10m) for official live competition games at a classic rhythm "with prizes" (3 or 4 hours), and its different anti-cheating methods (it is almost impossible to do them in person), I want to provide irrefutable proof with the analysis of the game that gave rise to the current media problem.
> Enjoy it, maybe they will change their personal and editorial opinion:

Niemann has cheated on over a hundred games (online games). That's utterly dishonest and shameful for both titled & non-titled players.

Niemann would be banned for life in a parallel universe with much more sense than ours. Simply you can't go out live on the telly and tell the whole chess world you are a cheater and then carry on as usual.

On the other hand, you didn't prove anything, your analysis only convinced yourself.

Niemann is a fake version of a modern chess player, a forgery

The question it is simple: you confuse classic chess with blitz online.

@Paramos said in #4:
> The question it is simple: you confuse classic chess with blitz online.

Don't think so. If you cheat online you cheat OTB.

Everybody knows that cheating online is much easier than OTB, but you know, if you're a cheater (not you, just speaking in the second person), you are a cheater no matter the different aspects of life in which you are involved to.

I don't play with cheaters (unfortunately, there are thousands of them on online chess servers), and seems Magnus does neither.

The scandal would never have happened if Magnus beat Hans, in this obviously fair game. That fact alone is what pisses me off.

@Paramos said in #4:
> The question it is simple: you confuse classic chess with blitz online.

I hope u get a cheater every blitz game u ever play.

What I don't understand is why you guys trust in an unknown chess player and dismiss a five times chess world champion and number one on the lists since a long long time ago.

Magnus is the closest that a human being can mimic a computer. He can recognize patterns. Nowadays the engines aren't like some years ago. They can mimic human play and it's so hard to identify if the move itself belongs to a human or to a machine.

This guy (Niemann) would have been banned for life 99 times out of 100. The key factor is that FIDE doesn't have enough resources to identify OTB cheaters, at least if they (cheaters) use the latest available technology.

But it's a matter of time. Eventually, they (cheaters) will get caught.

Dear chess friends!

I recommend analyzing the game and then draw your objective conclusions.

Bye!