Since my join date, whenever I hover over my name, my bullet rating has always been missing and instead replaced with my classical/correspondence, is there any way I can make it appear?
Yes I have this issue with my bullet too, replaced with my correspondence which I don’t rlly care about, I have been wondering about this too!
I guess its because it shows the rating according to the order you have played from
My first game was classical that's why it shows the nasty turtle first
My first game was classical that's why it shows the nasty turtle first
Yes but I have played nearly 6000 bullet games and only like 400 correspondence
@EricEffiong said in #1:
> Since my join date, whenever I hover over my name, my bullet rating has always been missing and instead replaced with my classical/correspondence, is there any way I can make it appear?
@stanbad1 doesn't have bullet rating so I'm not really sure.
I haven't found any pattern on how to make bullet appear but I suppose you could always go to your profile and see?
Have a nice day!
EDIT: Maybe if you play variants it gets priority
> Since my join date, whenever I hover over my name, my bullet rating has always been missing and instead replaced with my classical/correspondence, is there any way I can make it appear?
@stanbad1 doesn't have bullet rating so I'm not really sure.
I haven't found any pattern on how to make bullet appear but I suppose you could always go to your profile and see?
Have a nice day!
EDIT: Maybe if you play variants it gets priority
Uhhh I do have a bullet rating I have played 5938 games of it lol. It’s 2487 if I’m not mistaken
Yes, I have noticed this too.
I would propose that the first row should be the same for all players and fixed to bullet, blitz, rapid and classical (from left to right) since these are the ratings that most players care about.
The ratings on the second row would be player specific and chosen based on activity, much like how it is now.
I would propose that the first row should be the same for all players and fixed to bullet, blitz, rapid and classical (from left to right) since these are the ratings that most players care about.
The ratings on the second row would be player specific and chosen based on activity, much like how it is now.
@doublecheck-j said in #7:
> Yes, I have noticed this too.
>
> I would propose that the first row should be the same for all players and fixed to bullet, blitz, rapid and classical (from left to right) since these are the ratings that most players care about.
>
> The ratings on the second row would be player specific and chosen based on activity, much like how it is now.
This would be perfect and i’m sure a lot of people would agree, how can we get this to the lichess development team?
> Yes, I have noticed this too.
>
> I would propose that the first row should be the same for all players and fixed to bullet, blitz, rapid and classical (from left to right) since these are the ratings that most players care about.
>
> The ratings on the second row would be player specific and chosen based on activity, much like how it is now.
This would be perfect and i’m sure a lot of people would agree, how can we get this to the lichess development team?
@saurabhsangeeth said in #3:
> I guess its because it shows the rating according to the order you have played from
> My first game was classical that's why it shows the nasty turtle first
no, that is not how it works. it's sorted by the time you have spent playing the variant. if op wants bullet to be shown, all they need to do is spend more time playing bullet.
> I guess its because it shows the rating according to the order you have played from
> My first game was classical that's why it shows the nasty turtle first
no, that is not how it works. it's sorted by the time you have spent playing the variant. if op wants bullet to be shown, all they need to do is spend more time playing bullet.
@glbert said in #9:
> no, that is not how it works. it's sorted by the time you have spent playing the variant. if op wants bullet to be shown, all they need to do is spend more time playing bullet.
@stanbad1 has spent much more time playing bullet than some of the other categories shown, where did you even get that information from, considering you only play classical chess..
> no, that is not how it works. it's sorted by the time you have spent playing the variant. if op wants bullet to be shown, all they need to do is spend more time playing bullet.
@stanbad1 has spent much more time playing bullet than some of the other categories shown, where did you even get that information from, considering you only play classical chess..
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.