Given the damage to chess with the world press's incoherent insinuation or accusation against the young American, mistaking neophytes, intentionally or not, for "prizeless" friendly online blitz games (-10m) for official live competition games at a classic rhythm "with prizes" (3 or 4 hours), and its different anti-cheating methods (it is almost impossible to do them in person), I want to provide irrefutable proof with the analysis of the game that gave rise to the current media problem.
Enjoy it, maybe they will change their personal and editorial opinion:
