Search "user:MeWantCookie"

I can verify you don't need deep study of openings at all practically. I am 2000 USCF now and I have beaten several IMs and some of my losses I resigned in an endgame where I Was better but got excite…

I am going to start attempts to see how well facebook live does in comparison to twitch. I know the biggest down side right now is when viewing on the monitor, the monitor gives off a slight glare. Ho…

Shatranj is indeed a form of chess. It is actually not known what the original form of this chess was. They believe the original is older than Shatranj. http://www.chess-poster.com/english/notes_and_f…

@RenatoEckel Are you still an Owen player?

Well prior to today you had to search books. And you had to do it through mound and mounds of authors. Consistent was Capablanca and Lasker. Today you can buy Igor Smirnov's video course and it covers…

There is no best way. It's all about how you learn. Judging if I may by your rating.. you should study basic chess ala Steinitz and forget about opening study.

https://en.lichess.org/forum/general-chess-discussion/how-do-you-stabilize-your-play?page=1

Those 'untold rules' everyone is spouting are a waste of time. You want to get better quickly? Learn any true variation of Steinitz laws of chess. They are referred to generally as principled chess or…

@blazeop You don't accept messages, so I don't know if you receive replies here. I will keep trying I guess. If you want, I can try to work with you. I think what you need though is to get use to stud…

@BoKemp I use to think this way. Recently I found out that it isn't true till ~2600 lichess or 2400+ OTB. I can actually right now go back to e4 play it for 100 games and literally prove it's not depe…