No #10, GM is the non-gender specific title. It is in the standard FIDE chess league, which includes Carlsen, Caruana, Nakamura, etc.
WGM is for women's leagues only, which are lower ranked. Judit never played in those because she found the skill level too low.
What #8 said. This is exactly why you need to look beyond computer analysis to study openings.
I don't make many mistakes but sometimes my deliberate choices are not "good" chess either.
That's what I said Hellball, the previous poster said that Polgar was a WGM, which she specifically is not because she never participated there, instead she is a GM. That is what I wrote ;).
9. g6 is awkward, bishop on g7 has no future because of pawns on a1-h8 diagonal. 14. b6 is incorrect too.
Note to self: Don't issue a post claiming "mistake free chess" and resign after 13 moves.
Ah, now I saw the comment you referred to was not mine, but the reaction to my comment... stupid paginated forum ;).
P.S. Analyze of chess games here is really thorough. But you can't blame owner of this site, because deep analyze consume enormously bigger computational efforts. Also, you can make it by yourself on your own PC at any depth ( almost any ;) ).
#18, it is not all that thorough. If you want to deeply analyse a game then yes, you ought to do analysis on your own computer. You can use the same software to do that:
http://stockfishchess.org/ -- but at greater depth.
PS: cool mate in the CAPTCHA
lichess.org/cTsEw8Wq#19, stockfish is only engine. It will not allow you to automate analysis. For this purpose you can use something like Scid:
http://scidvspc.sourceforge.net/ or write your own script :-)